Cases 11 - 20 of 10,874
Liu v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00571
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shaorong Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Roy Hudson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
John Christensen and Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Chris Anderson, Under Sheriff and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle-Giles v. Comanche County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant:
Comanche County Jail and LARC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Dewayne Antwon Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Spears v. Nganga et al
as 5:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Spears
Defendant:
Ginette Nganga and FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. United States et al
as 5:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
David L Spalding
Defendant:
United States and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prichard v. Stanek
as 5:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Tyson Stanek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy, III v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jerome Ferguson, S. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
