Cases 51 - 60 of 53,200
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Liles v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00563
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dylan Michael Liles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Liu v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00571
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shaorong Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Roy Hudson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
John Christensen and Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Chris Anderson, Under Sheriff and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brittain v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ray Brittain
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clark et al v. BRP LLC
as 5:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Shane Clark and Jennifer Clark
Defendant:
BRP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
NAJAFBEYGI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 5:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
MILAD NAJAFBEYGI
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dickerson v. Colmenares et al
as 5:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dickerson
Defendant:
Jose Colmenares and Eldon Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
