Cases 51 - 60 of 20,167
Hoid v. Gray Media Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Edward Hoid
Defendant:
Gray Media Group, Inc., d/b/a CBS KKTV 11 and Gray Media Group, Inc. doing business as CBS KKTV 11
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. URBN US Retail, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Sharp
Defendant:
URBN US RETAIL, LLC, URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. and ANTHROPOLOGIE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Winn v. Chapter Living
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff:
Darlene Winn
Defendant:
Chapter Living
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cox v. Armstrong, et al
as 24-4070
Plaintiff:
BARRY LYNN COX
Defendant:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District, ERIC GENTRY, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District, K. JAKE GRAFF, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District and others
Cruz et al v. Keeling et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ernestina R. Cruz, H. S. and J. S.
Defendant:
Brooke Keeling, Jolene Natewa, Christina Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Millard County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wade
Defendant:
Millard County Sheriff's Department, Jerid Bennett and Millard County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Villecco v. Barela
as 24-1258
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. BARELA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 24-1260
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant:
PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Jones v. Archuleta
as 1:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Mr. Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Deputy Joseph Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
