Cases 121 - 130 of 5,201
Ajoloko v. Jamas Technology Inc
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Pamela Ajoloko
Defendant:
Jamas Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCullough v. Mr. Pool, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Eric McCullough
Defendant:
Mr. Pool, Inc. and Ryan Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fournier v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Marie Fournier
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell v. Town of Hayneville, Alabama
as 2:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Mitchell
Defendant:
Town of Hayneville, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Fair Labor Standards Act
Click v. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
as 2:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
James Click
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Sushivillage AL Inc
as 2:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Oscar G Perez
Defendant:
Sushivillage AL Inc and Sushi Village AL Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harrison, Jr. v. Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carlton D. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Barnes Enterprises, Inc.
Smith v. Felder Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Theresa Smith
Defendant:
Felder Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McDuffie v. Robinson and Waldrop Landscape LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sydney McDuffie
Defendant:
Robinson and Waldrop Landscape LLC and Jeremy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
