Cases 51 - 60 of 89,341
Gaines, Jr v. AHC Nashville, LLC
as 3:2024cv00769
Defendant:
AHC Nashville, LLC doing business as AHC Nashville also known as Advanced Health Care of Nashville and Advanced Health Care of Nashville
Plaintiff:
Rogers Gaines, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Medical Malpractice
Hobbs v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Hobbs
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Majors v. Perry
as 3:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
Craig Majors
Defendant:
Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Freeze et al
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Moore
Defendant:
Ryan A. Freeze and Katie Ladefoged
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Justice
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Berrios
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Louis Turner
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WMK, LLC v. Mobility Works, LLC
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
WMK, LLC an Ohio Limited Liability Company doing business as MobilityWorks
Defendant:
Mobility Works, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
