Cases 91 - 100 of 9,280
Penrose Collateral, LLC et al v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Penrose Collateral, LLC a Domestic Limited Liability Company doing business as Penrose Pawnshop 2 and Michael Eric Garman
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Wendell Franklin, Thomas Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Barker v. Weatherford Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Derrick Duane Barker
Defendant:
Weatherford Police Department, Ryan Hetherington, Sean Lanier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Guthrie The City of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Richard Wallace
Defendant:
Guthrie The City of Oklahoma, Logan County Sheriff The and Michael Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield and New Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Roberts v. Dodd et al
as 6:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Falesha Babe Roberts
Defendant:
Gary W. Dodd, Christian Smith, Amanda Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
