Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 245,069
Hough v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv03077
Plaintiff: Malik Hough
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, (fnu) Carter, (fnu) Alatary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States v. Ulibarri
as 24-2080
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MANUEL JONATHAN ULIBARRI, AKA Manuel Ulibarri
United States v. Shelton
as 24-6100
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RODNEY JOE SHELTON
Hunter v. King, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff: JAMES HUNTER
Defendant: ALEXIS KING, District Attorney for the 1st Judicial District, in her official capacity, CHRIS SCHAFFER, Director of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, CHIEF SMITH, Chief of Police for the Lakewood Police Department, in his individual capacity and others
National Association for Gun Rights, et al v. Polis
as 24-1209
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES HIESTAND RICHARDSON, MAX EDWIN SCHLOSSER and others
Defendant: JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado,
United States v. Cromar
as 24-4053
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: PAUL KENNETH CROMAR
In re: Eckardt
as 24-6101
Petitioner: KYLE RICHARD ECKARDT
Respondent: SCOTT NUNN
Sifuentes Matallana v. Garland
as 24-9536
Petitioner: JULIO SIFUENTES MATALLANA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Rodriguez-Parra
as 24-6099
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSE RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-PARRA, AKA Sergio Perez-Cordova
American Food & Vending Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The
as 2:2024cv02108
Plaintiff: American Food & Vending Corporation
Defendant: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?