Cases 21 - 30 of 10,781
Hines v. St Clair Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Julius A Hines
Defendant:
St Clair Correctional Facility, Dean Beauford, Antoine Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shane Crow
Defendant:
Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Defendant:
Lyons Logan, Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ouedraogo v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Halima Ouedraogo
Respondent:
Warden Neely and Director of BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stewart v. Payne et al
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Tesheal Stewart
Defendant:
Robert Payne, Justin Nance and Valerie Brown Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foreman v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 2:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Darryl C Foreman
Respondent:
State of Alabama, The, Jefferson County and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Gillion et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Kenneth Gillion, S Moore, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant:
Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
