Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,104
Ghee v. Alabama Power Company et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: Samual Ghee
Defendant: Alabama Power Company, Southern Company and The City of Valley Grande, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Latham v. Robinson
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Lori A. Latham
Defendant: Brett Robinson
Hays v. Kallis Love Stuff
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: Valencia Hays
Defendant: Kallis Love Stuff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
22nd State Bank v. Berger et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: 22nd State Bank
Defendant: Kenneth Berger, K. Berger Construction, Inc., Direct Floors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama v. Berger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: State of Alabama
Defendant: Kenneth Douglas Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Young v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Mary Denise Young
Defendant: William Lumpkin, Louvenia Lumpkin, Kanitra Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Lumpkin Highway Contracting, et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Mary Denise Young
Defendant: Lumpkin Highway Contracting, William Lumpkin, Louvenia Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?