Cases 1 - 10 of 4,102
Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Carl Garrett
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HORNSBY, Manuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARKE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
JEROME CLARKE
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. LOVE
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
Officer LOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON and TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. GARMON
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOWE
Defendant:
MS GARMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISHON v. JACKSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
SETH AXLEY WISHON
Defendant:
JACKSON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and Captain GLENDA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
