Cases 31 - 40 of 159,577
JENKINS v. CAMBELL et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Defendant:
EDGAR, PENSACOLA FLORIDA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CAMBELL
Plaintiff:
VICTOR J JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ONEIL v. ADKISON
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
ONEIL
Defendant:
MICHAEL A ADKISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFOUNTAIN v. ADKINSON
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
NELLIE LAFOUNTAIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richberg, Frank v. Wellpath et al
as 9:2024cv81150
Defendant:
Wellpath and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Frank Richberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Traub v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Sumter County)
as 5:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
William Davidson Traub
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Correcrtions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawkins et al v. Escobar Association et al
as 8:2024cv02206
Defendant:
Dee Ann D. Athan and Escobar Association
Plaintiff:
Algerine Thomas, Anton Dawkins and Michael C. Arline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins-Verellen v. Oak Hill Hospital
as 8:2024cv02213
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins-Verellen
Defendant:
Oak Hill Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaHanse v. Neill et al
as 6:2024cv01703
Defendant:
Deputy Kaitlyn Gordon, Deputy Michael Neill and Deputy Dylan Weber
Plaintiff:
Christopher LaHanse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchins v. Dixon et al
as 6:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ashford Hutchins
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins-Verellen et al v. Hernando County Corrections
as 8:2024cv02207
Plaintiff:
Amy Beth Mawson and Sylvia Hope Hudgins-Verellen
Defendant:
Hernando County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
