Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 157,990
Zapata v. Zapata
as 1:2024cv02712
Plaintiff: Jose Zapata
Defendant: Enrique Zapata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00092
Petitioner: GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent: Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Herrada v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-12012
Petitioner: JOSE HERRADA
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Garrett v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff: Carl Garrett
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HORNSBY, Manuel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgos
as 0:2024cv61076
Petitioner: Badi Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera, Wilfredo v. Lastinger
as 2:2024cv14193
Plaintiff: Wilfredo Rivera
Defendant: Caitlin Lastinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Nicklous v. Rivera et al
as 9:2024cv80757
Plaintiff: Nicklous Anderson and Nicholas Anderson
Defendant: Tillman Rivera and 15th Judicial Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
KROFT v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Defendant: JIMMY LEE KROFT, WALKER, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KROFT v. RATHAL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant: RATHAL, JOHN DOE and K M ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. TODD et al
as 5:2024cv00191
Plaintiff: JAHMOL HILL
Defendant: SGT CRYSTAL TODD, CORPORAL SHERMAN CHILDS and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?