Cases 81 - 90 of 8,194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Greene v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00781
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Channing Greene
Evaluator:
ENE Evaluator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Antonucci et al v. Winters et al
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Casey Mathieu and Melinda Antonucci
Defendant:
Aryka Radke, Christopher Winters, Stacey Edmunds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Goldsmith v. Raw Media Group LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Defendant:
Juan Escobar and Raw Media Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Tom Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00952
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Buswell v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, C.O. Juels, Greg Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Malachi A. Buswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fordham v. Jaddou et al
as 2:2024cv00953
Defendant:
Nikolas P. Kerest, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Frantz Germain and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Mitchell Fordham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
