Cases 51 - 60 of 738,535
Rodriguez v. Mount Airy #1, L.L.C.
as 3:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Alida Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mount Airy #1 L.L.C. doing business as Mount Airy Casino Resort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Arnold v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Dale R. Arnold
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board, Warden of SCI-Benner Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Primecare Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Shane Kennedy
Defendant:
Primecare Medical, Inc., York County Prison, York County Prison Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heck v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Heck
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ROBERTS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv05872
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Robert James Piper
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini, The State of Delaware and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luxer Corporation v. Parcel Pending, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Luxer Corporation
Defendant:
Parcel Pending, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Luxer Corporation v. ButterflyMX, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Luxer Corporation
Defendant:
ButterflyMX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Luxer Corporation v. Package Concierge, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Luxer Corporation
Defendant:
Package Concierge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
LOGICAL SOLUTION SERVICES INC.
as 3:2024cv06276
Plaintiff:
LOGICAL SOLUTION SERVICES INC.
Defendant:
RICHARD MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
