Cases 11 - 20 of 167,370
Simpson v. Armstrong et al
as 5:2024cv00209
Defendant:
Eric Guy, Krystal Sherrill, Coley Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fenlon v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03472
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Robert Maxwell Fenlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westberry v. Fletcher et al
as 2:2024cv00758
Defendant:
Scott Rectenwald, Brad Morin, B.J. Fletcher and others
Petitioner:
Joshua Warren Westberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberson v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00476
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Stanley Bruce Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02350
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Howard Weatherall, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02351
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Howard Weatherall, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weatherall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02352
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Howard Weatherall, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright-Nasalski v. Fikes
as 4:2024cv00886
Petitioner:
Devon Wright-Nasalski
Respondent:
W. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bennett
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Brian Bennett
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-00123-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00382
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Edwards, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
