Cases 71 - 80 of 103,149
Hicks v. Hill County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lashun Hicks
Defendant:
Hill County Sheriff's Office, Hill County Jail and Dalvin Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. Bergami
as 3:2024cv01601
Petitioner:
Xuan Nguyen
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aviles v. Scurry County et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Cornelio Aviles
Defendant:
Scurry County and Scurry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02408
Petitioner:
Steven Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrian A. Amonett, Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Kate Willis, John Kinnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Senior Warden Adrain A. Amonett, Assistant Warden Candice Hannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savoy v. USA
as 1:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Horace Savoy, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Villasana v. Rivera et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Defendant:
Delia Lopez, Sheriff Oscar Rivera, Sgt. David Silvas and others
Plaintiff:
Audencio G. Villasana, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatton v. Unknown Defendants
as 9:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tommie Ray Chatton
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
