Cases 21 - 30 of 443,631
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. LG Electronics Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Defendant:
LG Electronics Inc, LG Electronics USA Inc and LG Electronics Alabama Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vita et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Godfrey et al v. Morales et al
as 3:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jakema Godfrey and JLH
Defendant:
NFN Morales and Kaufman County Constables
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edmunds Lewis v. City of Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Megan C. Edmunds Lewis
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Petitioner:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Respondent:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
