Cases 71 - 80 of 29,365
Glomb v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Robert Glomb
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
Walter Nicholas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burnett v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Amy Burnett
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
North v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
Christopher North
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Batson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
Shelton Batson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Belisle et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nicole Belisle and Paul Belisle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ghabra v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv11436
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Ghabra
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sigona v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Sigona
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Shereen Bailey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Dennis Carr
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
