Cases 61 - 70 of 6,088
Boswell v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01412
Plaintiff:
John Boswell
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stecich v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01400
Plaintiff:
Diane Stecich
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Status Group Inc. v. Trunck
as 1:2024cv01328
Counter Defendant:
The Status Group Inc. and Leonardo Vega
Counter Claimant:
Joshua Trunck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Turner v. Zeigler Hoffman Estates I, LLC
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Devon Turner
Defendant:
Zeigler Hoffman Estates I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Daly v. The Wonderful Company LLC
as 1:2024cv01267
Plaintiff:
John Daly
Defendant:
The Wonderful Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HICKS v. CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
ESTHER HICKS
Defendant:
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Wilson v. Strzyzewski
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilson
Defendant:
Richard Strzyzewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHEP USA v. A-1 PALLET CO. OF CLARKSVILLE, INC.
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
CHEP USA
Defendant:
A-1 PALLET CO. OF CLARKSVILLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Porter v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter and reginald-darnell
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Mathew C. Gladwell, Aaron M. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
MacMullen v. United Home Loans, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Tammie MacMullen
Defendant:
United Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
