Cases 31 - 40 of 14,385
Klund v. USA
as 3:2024cv00402
Petitioner:
Craig Klund
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blue, Susan v. Boetcher, David et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Blue
Defendant:
David Boetcher, Michael Killian, Thomas Lemens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Matushak
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Vance H Smith
Respondent:
Anthony Matushak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman, Andrew v. Radcliffe, Richard et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Sherman
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Richard A. Radcliffe, District Attorney Kevin Croninger and Attorney Rachel Pisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. English
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sara English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Dremel et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Lamanuel Wolfe
Defendant:
Robert Dremel, Jenny Vallaincourt, Sara English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility
as 2:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Brandon Edwards
Defendant:
Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartz, Michael v. Derus, Melinda et al
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Michael Donn Bartz
Defendant:
Melinda Derus, Erin Dunahay, Chad McCune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Baynton et al
as 2:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Montgomery E Walker
Defendant:
Charles M Baynton, Joseph A Mclean, Justin S Ribault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
