Cases 11 - 20 of 3,886
Bruce Cohen v. Consilio, LLC, et al
as 24-2079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Charles Cohen, individually, as private attorney general, and on behalf of similarly situated individuals.
Defendant:
Consilio, LLC and Consilio Services, LLC
Way v. Alcatraz LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Christopher Way
Defendant:
Alcatraz LLC, Zbigniew Matukin and Agnes Matukin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Buford v. Ascension Genesys Hospital
as 4:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Chevon Buford
Defendant:
Ascension Genesys Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Painter v. Warrenton Manor, L.L.C.
as 4:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Susan Painter
Defendant:
Warrenton Manor, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Keysor et al v. Uncle Julio's Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Audrey Keysor, Cyle Quick and Liv Wysocki
Defendant:
Uncle Julio's Corporation and The Mexican Restaurant, Inc
Hall v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hall
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #18921, Andrew King, Lisa Stone and others
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Knighten v. Drury Hotels Company, LLC
as 4:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kayla Knighten
Defendant:
Drury Hotels Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McBride v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Richard McBride
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bedwell v. The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bedwell
Defendant:
The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
