Cases 1 - 10 of 20,780
Rushing v. Cape Girardeau City Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
Cape Girardeau City Police Department, Missouri State Police Agency and Cape Girardeau Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunther v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
as 4:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Rex S. Gunther
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. USA
as 3:2024cv05040
Petitioner:
Quennel A. Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. Morriss
as 5:2024cv06076
Petitioner:
Christopher M King
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whalen v. Southeast Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Deion A. Whalen, Sr.
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Center, Bill Stange, Lorainne Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Buckner
as 1:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Will Frazier, Jr.
Respondent:
Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. USA
as 4:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Charles Gray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duncan v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Barrett N. Duncan
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Yetman et al
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Cook
Defendant:
Officer M. Yetman, A. Shumate and St. Francois County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dietz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Larry B. Dietz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
