Cases 121 - 130 of 14,878
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. Konikson Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00295
Defendant:
Doe Partnerships 1-20, Doe Defendants 1-20, Doe Corporations 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bowman v. Connors
as 1:2024cv00293
Defendant:
Clare E. Connors
Plaintiff:
Montell Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramiro v. Southwest Airlines Co.
as 1:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Southwest Airlines Co.
Plaintiff:
Melbourne Ramiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Murray v. Scharf et al
as 1:2024cv00289
Defendant:
Charles W. Scharf doing business as Wells Fargo and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Murray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Seui v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kapesi Seui
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Emory v. USA
as 1:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
Timothy Samuel Hugh Emory
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hermanns-Raymond v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv00286
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Plaintiff:
Rocky Hermanns-Raymond
Defendant:
Jermaine Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zone v. Youtube.com LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Youtube.com LLC, Does unnamed and Neal Mohan
Plaintiff:
Rade Q Zone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
