Cases 81 - 90 of 59,751
Alvarez Vergara v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00883
Defendant:
Joaquin Alvarez Vergara and State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Holt v. Century Theatres, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Holt
Defendant:
Century Theatres, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Koerner v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kelly Koerner
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solares et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Solares and Estefania Correa
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James v. Ely State Prison's AWO T. Cooke
as 2:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Laneil James
Defendant:
Ely State Prison's AWO T. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mims et al v. Kalakau et al
as 2:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Delron Mims and Shareef Brown
Defendant:
Shentel Kalakau and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Global Protection Corp. v. Thai Nippon Rubber Industry et al
as 2:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Global Protection Corp.
Defendant:
Thai Nippon Rubber Industry and TNR USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
No Tan Lines Republik v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
No Tan Lines Republik
Defendant:
Jim Anderson, Jeanine D'Errico and G Murrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Davis
Defendant:
John Warner and B.C. & T., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
