Cases 101 - 110 of 2,397
Britford v. McClain et al
as 7:2023cv01356
Petitioner:
Randy Earl Britford
Respondent:
Warden III Antonio McClain, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Defendant:
Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Sharpton et al
as 2:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Antwone Wilson
Defendant:
Dr. Sharpton and Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. QCHC
as 5:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carnell Crayton
Defendant:
QCHC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Saint Clair County et al
as 2:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Antwone Lonezo Wilson
Defendant:
Saint Clair County, Arnaldo Mercado, Brian Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Payne
as 2:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Andrew E McNeal
Defendant:
Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shropshire v. McClain et al
as 4:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Shropshire
Defendant:
Antonio McClain, Hon. Steve Marshall, Etowah County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Erick Lindsey
Defendant:
Investigator James Mickey Young, Keith Cox and Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varise v. Riggins et al
as 5:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Gerald Geralmee Varise
Defendant:
Zefen Riggins, Huntsville Police Department, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Blount County Correctional Facility
as 5:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
Shallowmist Martin
Defendant:
Blount County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
