Cases 51 - 60 of 8,674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Essex et al v. County of Imperial, a Governmental Entity et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Elicia Essex and Kristina Essex
Defendant:
County of Imperial, Naphcare, Rosemary Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Sanchez v. Bonta
as 3:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Gary R Sanchez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Schelb v. Tesla, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Gary Schelb
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Barnes v. Right
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Civil Right
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
