General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 91 - 100 of 5,864
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01259
Petitioner: James E. Lackey
Respondent: Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner: Tiki Sims
Respondent: Warden Steven Scroggins and Screven County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obeginski v. Walker
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner: AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent: Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez-Alvarez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01064
Petitioner: Argentis Martinez-Alvarez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hollowell v. Tripp
as 1:2024cv00659
Petitioner: Jo'Von Montell Hollowell
Respondent: Warden B. Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Helton v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00604
Petitioner: Norton Helton
Respondent: Warden Sylester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daddario v. Hall County et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Petitioner: Lawrence Daddario
Respondent: Hall County and Autry State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner: Otis Parker
Respondent: Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner: Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?