Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Upshaw v. Custer et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Radiance Marie Upshaw
Defendant: Jason Custer, John Bohdan and Lawrence Shine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Link
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: John A. Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?