Cases 81 - 90 of 11,396
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Torrence Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Hogan
Defendant:
Sherrif Hershberger and Pgs - 1 to 9 Names of Staff Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brownlee v. South Bend Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jesse Brownlee
Defendant:
South Bend Police Department and St Joseph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holm v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeremiah Holm
Defendant:
J Galipeau and Bridegroom
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Glassel
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
