Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bike v. Covetrus, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Eric Bike
Defendant: Covetrus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dilworth v. Tucker
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: Christopher Dilworth
Defendant: Landon Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Liggins
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Elizabeth White
Defendant: De'Angelo Liggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Toy v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff: Willie Lee Toy, Sr.
Defendant: Tameka Jones, Abraham Gates, Humphreys County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams et al v. Humphreys County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Cordney Williams and David James
Defendant: Humphreys County Sheriff's Department, Humphreys County Board of Supervisors and Humphreys County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?