Cases 11 - 20 of 296
Richardson v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richardson
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 1:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSRANCE COMPANY and Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Milbank Insurance Company v. DGL Group Ltd.
as 2:2023cv03691
Plaintiff:
Milbank Insurance Company
Defendant:
DGL Group Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Mission Essential Group, LLC
as 2:2023cv03365
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Mission Essential Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Skinner v. Bath & Body Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03226
Plaintiff:
Christopher Skinner
Defendant:
Bath & Body Works, Inc., Bath & Body Works, LLC and Bath & Body Works Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barefoot v. Peoples Bank
as 2:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Barefoot
Defendant:
Peoples Bank doing business as Limestone Bank, Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
McDonald v. Peoples Bank
as 2:2023cv03084
Plaintiff:
Stephen McDonald
Defendant:
Peoples Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
The Federal Savings Bank v. Lower, LLC
as 2:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
The Federal Savings Bank
Defendant:
Lower, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
