Cases 31 - 40 of 15,270
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Curran v. Hall
as 4:2024cv00423
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Markia Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reed et al v. Ascension Health et al
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Joshua Reed and Anthony Acuna
Defendant:
Shawnna Yost and Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Gilbert v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00421
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Petitioner:
Isaiah Hasan Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livesay v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 4:2024cv00422
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Plaintiff:
Wayne Livesay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
DG v. Oklahoma State Board of Education
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
DG
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gobob Pipe & Steel Sales, L.L.C. v. Northquip, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Northquip, Inc. doing business as Arrowquip
Plaintiff:
Gobob Pipe & Steel Sales, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Miles v. Rogers County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00417
Defendant:
Zachary Starkey, Brandon Masingale, Rogers County Board of Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Melisha Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopper v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Defendant:
Amy Fletcher, J Fiorio, C Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Dewane Hopper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
