Cases 61 - 70 of 10,986
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. City of Nashville, The et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Antonio Clark
Defendant:
City of Nashville, The, State of Tennessee, The, Buddy Rhett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Korbyn Ordway
Defendant:
Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Perry
Defendant:
Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00481
Petitioner:
Randall Parker
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tarvin et al v. Cobble et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Tarvin and Annie Barnes
Defendant:
Brett Cobble and f/n/u Higdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Ramsey William Harris
Defendant:
Vincent Vantell and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffries v. Vantell
as 3:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Joseph Marquis Jefferies and Joseph Marquis Jeffries
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
