Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,663
Brown v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02423
Petitioner: Theotis Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Shelby County Sheriff
as 2:2024cv02422
Defendant: Shelby Cty. Sheriff Shelby County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Plaintiff: Darrin Moore
Defendant: Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02416
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kiner v. Shelby County Health Department et al
as 2:2024cv02412
Plaintiff: Gerald Kiner
Defendant: Shelby County Health Department and Travis Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liu v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02413
Plaintiff: Xiang Liu
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and Lynuel Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02432
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02409
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ford v. Fayette County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02405
Plaintiff: Dr. fabre ford
Defendant: Fayette County, Tennessee, Sheriff Bobby Riles, matthew salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?