Cases 61 - 70 of 5,663
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ross v. Tipton County
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Shelby Ross
Defendant:
Tipton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Shelby County Board of Education
as 2:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
The Satanic Temple, Inc.
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Krasner Loan Co., Inc d/b/a American Loan Company v. Ferraris et al
as 2:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Krasner Loan Co., Inc. doing business as American Loan Company
Defendant:
Emil S Ferraris, Brent E Weirich, City of Bartlett, Tennessee Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Postles v. Courtner
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Johnny Justin Postles
Defendant:
Matthew Robert Courtner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joy v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Joy
Defendant:
Larry McKenzie, Tyler Burchyett and 25th Judicial District Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant:
Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
