Cases 51 - 60 of 7,393
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02547
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Malik Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. Johnson, et al
as 2:2024cv02546
Defendant:
Officer Owens, Cpt T. Johnson and Phillips, Ms.
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel James Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitts v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02542
Petitioner:
Gerry Stitts
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02539
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cortez Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edwards v. Adams, Jr., Warden
as 1:2024cv01160
Petitioner:
Mickey Edwards
Respondent:
Robert Adams, Jr., Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2024cv01161
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Willie James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Matthews et al
as 2:2024cv02535
Defendant:
DRT T. Davis, DRT Matthews and DRT B. Stewart
Plaintiff:
Nictavious French
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson, Mark v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02533
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office and John T. Fowlkes
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson, Mark v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02532
Defendant:
Damon K. Griffin, John T. Fowlkes and Nathan P. Brooks
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Shelbourne Jamal Mason
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
