Cases 1 - 10 of 9,375
Smith v. Warden Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Respondent:
Warden Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duran v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 4:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
David Duran
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Damon Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00255
Petitioner:
Arturo Solis
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
Casey Michael Taylor
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Petty v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Stanley Lanech Petty, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chappell v. Hillhouse
as 6:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Gregory Cash Chappell
Respondent:
Sheriff Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vandenabeelen v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00218
Petitioner:
Anthony Vandenabeelen
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Sugar Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fregia, Sr v. Securus, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr
Respondent:
Securus, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
