Cases 41 - 50 of 11,293
Hulbert v. VADOC Publication Review Committee
as 7:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
VADOC Publication Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Deonta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, David Anderson, Joseph D. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Craig Johnson and Sgt. E.C. Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Al-Akhir Islam Muhammad Bryant
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Major King, Nurse Practitioner Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Jered C. Pope
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimble v. Ritchie
as 7:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Eugene Junior Kimble
Defendant:
Clark A. Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. McCall
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brian Turner
Defendant:
Matt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Gullett et al
as 7:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
Captain Gullett, Major Parks and Smantha Parson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
