Cases 111 - 120 of 4,587
Stahmann v. Ludwig
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Brett Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bounds v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Bounds
Defendant:
Kirsten L Johnson, Randy Jones and Zack Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. West Allis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kylik Hyshaumadeen Hicks
Defendant:
West Allis Police Department, Officer Cooper and Officer Cuello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanley v. Mercy Health Hospital and Medical Center et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Gary M Hanley
Defendant:
Mercy Health Hospital and Medical Center, Town of Geneva Police Department and Ryan Smelker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephenson v. Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Grace C Stephenson, Grace C Johnson and Grace C Stephenson Johnson
Defendant:
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Children
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Racine City Clerk Odd Number Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Racine City Clerk Odd Number Doe, Michael J Piontek and David C Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Noonan
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
David C Juarez
Defendant:
Patric J Noonan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
