Cases 101 - 110 of 15,644
Prysok, Chris et al v. Town of Bell, Board of Supervisors
as 3:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Paddle Ride Adventure, LLC and Chris Prysok
Defendant:
Town of Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Steptoe, David et al v. Thorpy, Michael
as 3:2024cv00578
Defendant:
Michael Thorpy
Plaintiff:
David Steptoe, Ebony Moore and Brittany Pridgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Brandon, Jenniffer v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Jenniffer R. Brandon
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frick, Tyler v. Progressive Corporation
as 3:2024cv00574
Defendant:
Progressive Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tyler C. Frick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pick, Jason v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00573
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Pick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Loop LLC v. CDK Global, LLC
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Loop LLC doing business as Autoloop
Defendant:
CDK Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Young, Michael v. The City of Fond du Lac Wisconsin police et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Defendant:
The City of Fond du Lac Wisconsin police and Police Chief for the City of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schworck, Jesse v. Dane County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2024cv00569
Respondent:
Attorney General Josh Kaul, Dane County Circuit Court, The Honorable Ellen Berz and others
Petitioner:
Jesse Schworck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leonides-Torres, Ricardo v. FCI Oxford's Warden
as 3:2024cv00570
Respondent:
FCI Oxford's Warden
Petitioner:
Ricardo Leonides-Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
