Cases 1 - 10 of 4,822
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeemer v. Tibbs
as 5:2024cv00115
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Morrisey et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Inc., Durata Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Patrick Morrisey, Allan McVey, John Bernabei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ij Federal Question Injunction and Declaratory Relief
Mills v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Willard Mills
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. McVey et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Defendant:
Allan McVey, Patrick J. Morrisey and West Virginia Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In Re: Ethan Hoke, Michael Lee Roselle, Tyler Ray Young - Petit Jury Service
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2024mc00112
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. City of Wheeling, West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Defendant:
City of Wheeling, West Virginia and The City of Wheeling Planning Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.