Cases between January 1, 2004 and June 19, 2009 matching "heckler"
Cases 131 - 140 of 215
Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Dong Ying Manufacturing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09129
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heckler & Koch, Inc. et al v. Airsplat We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09123
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Airsoft G.I. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09138
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heckler & Koch, Inc. et al v. Kenneth Chang We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09119
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Thomas Li We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09121
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heckler & Koch, Inc. et al v. Evike.Com, Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv09128
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
O'KEEFE et al
as 3:2009cv05447
Plaintiff: CINDY O'KEEFE, CINDY O'KEEFE, DENNIS O'KEEFE and others
Defendant: LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE A. HECKER, LAURENCE A. HECKLER, APM FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bayramoglu v. Hartley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv04648
Petitioner: Fikri Bayramoglu
Respondent: J. D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finkel v. Heckler Electric Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv04074
Plaintiff: Gerald Finkel
Defendant: Heckler Electric Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?