Cases 41 - 50 of 13,031
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Travis John Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Maslo v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Antonia Maslo
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parks v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
Joshua Parks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wester v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03156
Plaintiff:
Tina Louise Wester
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gartner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Carrie Gartner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Boyd v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
William Boyd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dudley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dudley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Songer, Jr. v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Andrew Songer, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ayers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Ayers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
