Cases 11 - 20 of 3,400
STEVENS v. TD BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv08311
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
MSCHF PRODUCT STUDIOS, INC. v. D2 LOGISTICS, INC.
as 2:2024cv08284
Plaintiff:
MSCHF Product Studios, Inc.
Defendant:
D2 LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
NEWELL v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2024cv08246
Plaintiff:
JAMES J NEWELL
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
HAMMETT v. CHASE AUTO et al
as 2:2024cv08199
Plaintiff:
JALYN HAMMETT
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and COCCIA KIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KEEGAN v. DEMIR et al
as 2:2024cv08184
Defendant:
GURKAN DEMIR, SEBNEM GULER DEMIR and ATA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEEGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EAVES v. THE STARS GROUP, US et al
as 3:2024cv08108
Defendant:
FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT P.L.C., NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, MOUNT AIRY #1, LLC doing business as MOUNT AIRY CASINO & RESORT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRYANT EAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MATEO v. WELLS FARGO, N.A.
as 2:2024cv08056
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO, N.A.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MATEO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
CERRONE v. SERVIS ONE, INC.
as 1:2024cv07940
Defendant:
SERVIS ONE, INC. in its own right and doing business as BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CERRONE, JR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BARNETT v. SERVIS ONE, INC.
as 2:2024cv07845
Plaintiff:
BRYANT BARNETT
Defendant:
SERVIS ONE, INC. doing business as BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
