Cases 1 - 10 of 8,711
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller v. Mississippi Tank and Manufacturing Company
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miller
Defendant:
Mississippi Tank and Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miller v. Thigpen et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Miller
Defendant:
Deputy Xavier Thigpen and Jones County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. City of Pearl, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Clamekus Johnson
Defendant:
City of Pearl, Mississippi, Chief Dean Scott, Officer James R. Stovall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hamrick et al v. Carter Motorcars, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Hailey Hamrick and Eric Runnels
Defendant:
Carter Motorcars, LLC, Officer Michael Reaves, City of Laurel, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
