Cases 111 - 120 of 260,926
Manougian v. TD Bank North America
as 1:2024cv04429
Plaintiff:
Christine Manougian
Defendant:
TD Bank North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Salesland Costa Rica SRL v. Tekmovil LLC
as 1:2024cv22404
Plaintiff:
Salesland Costa Rica SRL
Defendant:
Tekmovil LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Beefree, LLC v. Unicoin Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22407
Plaintiff:
Beefree, LLC
Defendant:
Unicoin Inc. and Silvina Moschini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Richardson v. Cooper
as 1:2024cv22402
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Richardson
Defendant:
Richard L. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Robinson v. R.A.L. Construction, LLC
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Robinson
Defendant:
R.A.L. Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
SOUTHSTATE BANK, N.A. v. F-5 VENTURES, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
SOUTHSTATE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
F-5 VENTURES, INC., GREGORY ELLIS ROBBINS and SHANNON LYNN ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
GARG v. SLALOM INC. et al
as 2:2024cv07156
Plaintiff:
SIDDHARTH GARG and SID
Defendant:
SLALOM INC. doing business as SLALOM CONSULTING, JOHN/JAN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Beefree, LLC v. Unicoin Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22408
Plaintiff:
Beefree, LLC
Defendant:
Unicoin Inc. and Silvina Moschini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Anderson v. STS Aviation Group, LLC
as 2:2024cv14201
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
STS Aviation Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
METZ v. DIVIDEND
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY METZ
Defendant:
DIVIDEND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
