Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Newhoff et al v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darlee Newhoff and Jacqueline Newhoff
Defendant:
R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC, James Samuelson, John Doe 1 - X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lonas v. Double J. Manufacturing and Repair, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Diane Lonas
Defendant:
Double J. Manufacturing and Repair, Inc. and Daniel Blackman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathers v. Abney
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sean Mathers
Defendant:
Adam Abney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez et al v. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Miguel B. Perez and Luis Olivares Medina
Defendant:
Black Hills Trucking, Inc. and Melvin L. Nordhagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. Farden Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00093
Plaintiff:
Johan S. Garcia
Defendant:
Farden Construction, Inc. and Lyle F. Clegg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock v. Jim Hipner, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Huey Brock
Defendant:
Jim Hipner, LLC, Robert Lopez and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaiser v. Broyhill et al
as 4:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Clayton Kaiser
Defendant:
Larry Broyhill and Willbros Construction, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Willbros Construction, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Clayton Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Overcash v. Jones Contractors, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Brandy Overcash
Defendant:
Jones Contractors, Inc. , Ian O'Neal and Hertz Corporation, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. O'Meara
as 3:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Melton J. O'Meara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gimlin et al v. Hatfield, et al
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Gimlin and Stacey Gimlin
Defendant:
Rodney Hatfield and Farmers Union Oil Company of Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.