Cases 41 - 50 of 3,034
Hiers v. Blackwell et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Shanon Hiers
Defendant:
Stephen Blackwell and Dawn Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Simmons v. Family Dollar et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Shelia Simmons
Defendant:
Family Dollar, Family Dollar Stores of Alabama, LLC and Shameakeaia Madison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Woodward et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gary Alan Woodward
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc, BP America Production Company, Transocean Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fincher v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Angela Fincher
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smart v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Smart
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and Alfa Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Terrell v. Waffle House, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tammy Terrell
Defendant:
Waffle House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Donohoo v. Unlimited Deliveries LLC
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Gary Lawton Donohoo
Defendant:
Unlimited Deliveries LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flores v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Katharina Flores
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Flores v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (CONSENT)
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Katharina Flores
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gibson v. Warrior Met Coal Inc
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Douglas Gibson
Defendant:
Warrior Met Coal Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
