Cases 61 - 70 of 39,005
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04283
Plaintiff:
Natalie E. Williams
Defendant:
City of New York, Mayor Eric L. Adams, Mayor Bill De Balsio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03938
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SMALLS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Department and Jerry Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brightman v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2024cv04189
Plaintiff:
Elliot Brightman
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Police Officer Momen Attia, Lieutenant Kenneth Garvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cavallo v. HPD Section 8 et al
as 1:2024cv04242
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cavallo
Defendant:
HPD Section 8 and Goddard Riverside
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. Ministry of Public Security of P.R. China et al
as 1:2024cv04022
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
Ministry of Public Security of P.R. China and Baise City Public Safety Bereau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ally Bank v. The City Of Rochester
as 6:2024cv06348
Plaintiff:
Ally Bank
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
V.S. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
V.S. and V.S. on behalf of her child E.S., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
PETITPHARE
as 1:2024cv03955
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PETITPHARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ally Bank v. The City Of Rochester
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ally Bank
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Leach et al
as 5:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Leach, Andrew Young and Micheal Merkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
