Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,575
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01011
Petitioner: Jaycent Pankey
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oruade v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02023
Petitioner: Caesar Oruade
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hitchcock v. USA
as 2:2023cv00179
Petitioner: Tyrone Lamas Hitchcock
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Joshua v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00312
Petitioner: Antoine Joshua
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02788
Petitioner: Davione Smith
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Compton v. USA
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner: Jody W Compton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lovell v. USA
as 3:2023cv00443
Petitioner: Ronnie R Lovell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02769
Petitioner: Stanley D. Johnson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kimbrough v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01281
Petitioner: Terrance Kimbrough
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alford v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02759
Petitioner: Arthur Alford, III
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?